Comment on "Atomic structure model of the reconstructed Si(557) surface with a triple step structure: Adatom-parallel dimer model"

abstract

Recently, [Oh Phys. Rev. B 77, 155430 (2008)] reported on an atomic model for the so-called Si(557)-reconstructed surface with regular triple steps. The atomic structure model proposed was developed on the basis of high-resolution scanning tunneling microscopy (STM) images and first-principles calculations performed to match such STM images. Here we argue that the STM image presented is affected by an artifact, most likely related to a multiple tip image effect. Among other issues with the image presented, the corner holes for (7x7) reconstruction on Si(111) terraces are not visible, since a doubled image superimposed smears out such characteristic depression. The (x7) periodicity deduced for the edge facets, in contrast with previously reported STM images and electron-diffraction studies which unambiguously indicate a (x2) periodicity, arises from the same artifact. Finally, we remark that the (557) surface orientation and (112) orientation of triple steps assumed for first-principles calculations disregard the latest experimental data available, which suggests this surface has a (7 7 10) orientation and the steps in triple step do not form a well-defined plane [Surf. Sci. 600, 4878 (2006)].

keywords

VICINAL SI(111) SURFACES; PB; MICROSCOPY; STABILITY; ARTIFACTS; ISLANDS; GROWTH; CHAINS

subject category

Physics

authors

Zhachuk, R; Pereira, S

our authors

Share this project:

Related Publications

We use cookies for marketing activities and to offer you a better experience. By clicking “Accept Cookies” you agree with our cookie policy. Read about how we use cookies by clicking "Privacy and Cookie Policy".